All modalitiesDoreen SoansGet Started
02 / 07Exploratory tool · not a diagnosis

Colour as a prompt for reflection

Lüscher Colour Test

I use colour choices as a gentle way into conversation. Your immediate preferences can give us language for what feels attractive, uncomfortable, energising or demanding in the present moment.

Ask about this approach

What it is—and what it is not.

You are invited to choose or rank specific colours by felt preference, without trying to choose the ‘right’ answer. The resulting interpretation is then checked against your own experience. Your story always has more authority than a colour score.

How we may work with it.

This is a flexible map, not a script. I adapt the process to your comfort, goals and response in the room.

  1. 01

    Respond intuitively

    You look at a standard set of colours and choose according to immediate preference rather than fashion or association.

  2. 02

    Notice the pattern

    The sequence is used to generate tentative themes about present needs, pressures and ways of responding.

  3. 03

    Check it with you

    We discuss what resonates, what does not, and what the exercise brings to mind. Nothing is treated as fact simply because the test suggests it.

  4. 04

    Open the conversation

    Useful themes can become starting points for deeper counselling work; unhelpful interpretations are set aside.

Places this conversation can go.

This can be useful when a direct question feels too narrow or when you would like a creative, non-verbal prompt to begin exploring your inner world.

  • 01Current emotional needs
  • 02Sources of pressure or frustration
  • 03Approach–avoidance patterns
  • 04Feelings that are difficult to name directly
  • 05A starting point when words feel hard to find

What the research says

Useful context, without overselling.

Research on the Lüscher test is old, limited and mixed. Some small studies reported associations with self-report or broad emotional screening, while later reviews note that reliability and construct validity are not consistently established. It should not be used as a stand-alone personality or mental-health assessment.

My care boundary

Your wellbeing comes before the method.

I use the exercise as a collaborative conversation prompt, not as a label, prediction or proof about your personality. It does not replace validated assessment when one is needed.

Before you decide.

Can I choose a colour because I simply like it?

Absolutely. The exercise asks for your response in that moment, and ordinary preference or cultural meaning may be part of it. We interpret cautiously and together.

Can the result diagnose anxiety, depression or trauma?

No. It is not a diagnostic test. A mental-health diagnosis requires an appropriate clinical assessment using established criteria and tools.

What if the interpretation does not feel true?

Then we do not force it. Your disagreement can itself clarify what is more accurate and important for you.

Go beyond the summary.

I believe you deserve enough context to make an informed choice. These links include original method descriptions and independent research where it is available.

  1. 01Lüscher diagnostics: colour as an instrumentMax Lüscher Foundation
  2. 02The Lüscher Color Test: a validity studyPerceptual and Motor Skills
  3. 03Construct validity, reliability and temporal stability reviewPsychology. Psychophysiology

Still wondering whether this is right for you?

You do not have to choose a method before we speak.

Start a private enquiry